On Sun, 1 June 2008 15:32:50 +0930, David Newall wrote: > > I've not used unionfs (nor aufs) so I'm not aware of its foibles, but I > can say that it's the right kind of solution. Rather than spend effort > implementing write support for read-only filesystems, why not put your > time into fixing whatever you see wrong with one or both of those? There is a strong argument to be made for fixing some problem once instead of N times. But when that solution is M times more complicated, with M being significantly larger than N, said argument becomes rather weak. And having looked at unionfs, I claim that your argument is paper-thin. Jörn -- /* Keep these two variables together */ int bar; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
