Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Side note: we have a couple of cases where I don't think we should use > the "sync" version at all. > > Both pipe_read() and pipe_write() have that > > if (do_wakeup) { > wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, ... > > code at the end, outside the loop. But those two wake-ups aren't > actually synchronous. Changing those to non-sync: BENCHMARK BEST TOTAL BYTES AVG BYTES STDDEV =============== =============== =============== =============== =============== pipe 305816126 36255936983 302132808 8880788 splice 282402106 27102249370 225852078 210033443 vmsplice 440022611 48896995196 407474959 59906438 Changing the others in pipe_read() and pipe_write() too: pipe 305609682 36285967942 302383066 7415744 splice 282475690 27891475073 232428958 201687522 vmsplice 451458280 51949421503 432911845 34925242 The cumulative patch is attached below. I'm not sure how well this should make a difference with my benchmark programs since each thread can run on its own CPU. David --- diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c index 9cd5cbef9552..c5e3765465f0 100644 --- a/fs/pipe.c +++ b/fs/pipe.c @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to) do_wakeup = 1; wake = head - (tail - 1) == pipe->max_usage / 2; if (wake) - wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll_locked( + wake_up_locked_poll( &pipe->wait, EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM); spin_unlock_irq(&pipe->wait.lock); if (wake) @@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to) /* Signal writers asynchronously that there is more room. */ if (do_wakeup) { - wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM); + wake_up_interruptible_poll(&pipe->wait, EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM); kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT); } if (ret > 0) @@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ pipe_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from) * syscall merging. * FIXME! Is this really true? */ - wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll_locked( + wake_up_locked_poll( &pipe->wait, EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM); spin_unlock_irq(&pipe->wait.lock); @@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ pipe_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from) out: __pipe_unlock(pipe); if (do_wakeup) { - wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM); + wake_up_interruptible_poll(&pipe->wait, EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM); kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_readers, SIGIO, POLL_IN); } if (ret > 0 && sb_start_write_trylock(file_inode(filp)->i_sb)) {