Re: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v3]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 30 May 2008 20:24:22 +0200
"Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > After we fixed the original issue, we can still think about this other
> > thing :)
> 
> Okay, by now quite a bit of my time has been wasted, and my patience
> is starting to get a little thin.

Well yeah.  This has been dragging on for ages.  I was going to just
apply this patch and stomp off again but this:

  "against 2.6.26rc2, with the 2008-05-19 git changes you sent me
   applied"

stymied me.

Please, if poss, just send a standalone, fully-changelogged,
not-referential-to-some-random-email-discussion patch and let's get
going.

(Where's Ulrich, btw?)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux