On Mon, 2019-10-28 at 11:28 -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > Hi Ian, > > On 10:14 02/10, Ian Kent wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-10-01 at 14:09 -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > <snip> > > > Anyway, it does sound like it's worth putting time into > > your suggestion of a kernel change. > > > > Unfortunately I think it's going to take a while to work > > out what's actually going on with the propagation and I'm > > in the middle of some other pressing work right now. > > Have you have made any progress on this issue? Sorry I haven't. I still want to try and understand what's going on there. > As I mentioned, I am fine with a userspace solution of defaulting > to slave mounts all of the time instead of this kernel patch. Oh, I thought you weren't keen on that recommendation. That shouldn't take long to do so I should be able to get that done and post a patch pretty soon. I'll get back to looking at the mount propagation code when I get a chance. Unfortunately I haven't been very successful when making changes to that area of code in the past ... Ian
