On 10/16/19 11:00 AM, Song Liu wrote: > Hi Jeff and J. Bruce, > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 9:55 AM Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 5:55 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On 10/1/19 5:12 PM, Song Liu wrote: >>>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 8:58 AM Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello. >>>>> >>>>> This is a small fix of a typo (or, more specifically, some remnant of >>>>> the old patch version spelling) in RWH_WRITE_LIFE_NOT_SET constant, >>>>> which is named as RWF_WRITE_LIFE_NOT_SET currently. Since the name >>>>> with "H" is used in man page and everywhere else, it's probably worth >>>>> to make the name used in the fcntl.h UAPI header in line with it. >>>>> The two follow-up patches update usage sites of this constant in kernel >>>>> to use the new spelling. >>>>> >>>>> The old name is retained as it is part of UAPI now. >>>>> >>>>> Changes since v2[1]: >>>>> * Updated RWF_WRITE_LIFE_NOT_SET constant usage >>>>> in drivers/md/raid5-ppl.c:ppl_init_log(). >>>>> >>>>> Changes since v1[2]: >>>>> * Changed format of the commit ID in the commit message of the first patch. >>>>> * Removed bogus Signed-off-by that snuck into the resend of the series. >>>> >>>> Applied to md-next. >>> >>> I think the core fs change should core in through a core tree, then >>> the md bits can go in at will after that. > > As Jens suggested, we should route core fs patches through core tree. Could > you please apply these patches? Since the change is small, probably you can > also apply md patches? > > Thanks, > Song > > PS: for the series: > > Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx> I applied 1/3 to the for-5.5/block core branch. -- Jens Axboe
