Hello. Miklos Szeredi wrote: > This is based on the vfs-cleanups(*) tree + the 8 patches posted > recently (which will be added to this tree shortly). Patching these 15 patches fails. I think this is because the 8 patches are missing. Can I see the 8 patches? 2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej 2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej 2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] 5 out of 5 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file fs/namei.c.rej 1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej 2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file mm/filemap.c.rej 2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej 2 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej 11 out of 12 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/namei.c.rej 2 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/namei.c.rej 2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file security/selinux/hooks.c.rej Regards. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
