Hi Ted, Jan, > Yeah, I believe this may be useful to implement in fstests in some fs > agnostic way. Thank you both for reviewing LTP tests. > > > ext4-nsec-timestamps [6] > > > -------------------- > > > Directory containing the shell script which is used to test nanosec timestamps > > > of ext4. > > This basically tests that the file system supports nanosecond > > timestamps, with a 0.3% false positive failure rate. Again, why? > > > ext4-subdir-limit [9] > > > ----------------- > > > Directory containing the shell script which is used to test subdirectory limit > > > of ext4. According to the kernel documentation, we create more than 32000 > > > subdirectorys on the ext4 filesystem. > > This is a valid test, although it's not what I would call a "high > > value" test. (As in, it's testing maybe a total of four simple lines > > of code that are highly unlikely to fail.) > These two may be IMHO worth carrying over to fstests in some form. The other > tests seem either already present in various fstests configs we run or > pointless as Ted wrote. As Sero already volunteered to contribute them to fstests (thanks Sero!), I'll send a patch to delete them from LTP. > Honza Kind regards, Petr
