> If and when the vaporware shows up in real hardware, and assuming that > fscrypt is useful for this hardware, we can name it > "super_duper_fancy_inline_crypto". :-) I think you are entirely missing the point. The point is that naming the option someting related to inline encryption is fundamentally wrong. It is related to a limitation of existing inline crypto engines, not related to the fudamental model. And all the other rambling below don't matter either.
