Hi, On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 08:06:20PM +0800, Chuhong Yuan wrote: > hfs_brec_update_parent misses a check for hfs_bnode_find and may miss > the failure. > Add a check for it like what is done in again. > > Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/hfsplus/brec.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/brec.c b/fs/hfsplus/brec.c > index 1918544a7871..22bada8288c4 100644 > --- a/fs/hfsplus/brec.c > +++ b/fs/hfsplus/brec.c > @@ -434,6 +434,8 @@ static int hfs_brec_update_parent(struct hfs_find_data *fd) > new_node->parent = tree->root; > } > fd->bnode = hfs_bnode_find(tree, new_node->parent); > + if (IS_ERR(fd->bnode)) > + return PTR_ERR(fd->bnode); You shouldn't just return here, you still hold a reference to new_node. The call to hfs_bnode_find() after the again label seems to be making a similar mistake. I don't think either one can actually fail though, because the parent nodes have all been read and hashed before, haven't they? > /* create index key and entry */ > hfs_bnode_read_key(new_node, fd->search_key, 14); > cnid = cpu_to_be32(new_node->this); > -- > 2.20.1 >
