Re: [PATCH 21/26] xfs: remove mode from xfs_reclaim_inodes()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/26] xfs: remove mode from xfs_reclaim_inodes()
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 03:39:46 -0700
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20191009032124.10541-22-david@fromorbit.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)

On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 02:21:19PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Because it's always SYNC_WAIT now.

Not really new in your series, but can use rename it to
xfs_reclaim_all_inodes if you touch all callers anyway?

References:
- [PATCH V2 00/26] mm, xfs: non-blocking inode reclaim
  - From: Dave Chinner
- [PATCH 21/26] xfs: remove mode from xfs_reclaim_inodes()
  - From: Dave Chinner

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 19/26] xfs: kill background reclaim work
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 22/26] xfs: track reclaimable inodes using a LRU list
Previous by thread: [PATCH 21/26] xfs: remove mode from xfs_reclaim_inodes()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 21/26] xfs: remove mode from xfs_reclaim_inodes()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux