Re: [PATCH] virtio-fs: rename num_queues to num_request_queues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Michael S. Tsirkin (mst@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 08:22:06PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 6:48 PM Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> > <dgilbert@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > * Stefan Hajnoczi (stefanha@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > > > The final version of the virtio-fs device specification renamed the
> > > > num_queues field to num_request_queues.  The semantics are unchanged but
> > > > this name is clearer.
> > > >
> > > > Use the new name in the code.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Consistent with the latest version that's just passed the voting;
> > > (see
> > > https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/201908/msg00113.html )
> > > so:
> > >
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Feel free to squash this patch.
> > 
> > Thanks, folded this one as well.
> > 
> > Miklos
> 
> So what's the plan for merging all this?
> Doesn't look like it was sent in the merge window, nor is
> it in linux-next.

It's in the version that got merged upstream over the weekend.

Dave

> -- 
> MST
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@xxxxxxxxxx / Manchester, UK



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux