Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Why is it organised this way? I mean, yes, technically, rxrpc is a > generic layer-6 protocol that any blah blah blah, but in practice no > other user has come up in the last 37 years, so why bother pretending > one is going to? Just git mv net/rxrpc fs/afs/ and merge everything > through your tree. Note that, unlike 9p, sunrpc and ceph, rxrpc is exposed as a network protocol and can be used directly with socket(AF_RXRPC, ...). I have part of a userspace tool suite that uses this. David
