On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 10:50:49AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:43:15PM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > > We don't need ->bmap anymore, only usage for it was FIBMAP, which is now > > gone. > > > > Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Changelog: > > V5: > > - Properly rebase against 5.3 > > - iomap_{bmap(),bmap_actor()} are now used also by GFS2, so > > don't remove them anymore > > V2: > > - Kill iomap_bmap() and iomap_bmap_actor() > > > > fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 24 ------------------------ > > fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h | 1 - > > 2 files changed, 25 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c > > index 4e4a4d7df5ac..a2884537d2c2 100644 > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c > > @@ -1138,29 +1138,6 @@ xfs_vm_releasepage( > > return iomap_releasepage(page, gfp_mask); > > } > > > > -STATIC sector_t > > -xfs_vm_bmap( > > - struct address_space *mapping, > > - sector_t block) > > -{ > > - struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(mapping->host); > > - > > - trace_xfs_vm_bmap(ip); > > - > > - /* > > - * The swap code (ab-)uses ->bmap to get a block mapping and then > > - * bypasses the file system for actual I/O. We really can't allow > > - * that on reflinks inodes, so we have to skip out here. And yes, > > - * 0 is the magic code for a bmap error. > > - * > > - * Since we don't pass back blockdev info, we can't return bmap > > - * information for rt files either. > > - */ > > - if (xfs_is_cow_inode(ip) || XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip)) > > Uhhhh where does this check happen now? All checks are now made in the caller, bmap_fiemap() based on the filesystem's returned flags in the fiemap structure. So, it will decide to pass the result back, or just return -EINVAL. Well, there is no way for iomap (or bmap_fiemap now) detect the block is in a realtime device, since we have no flags for that. Following Christoph's line of thought here, maybe we can add a new IOMAP_F_* so the filesystem can notify iomap the extent is in a different device? I don't know, just a thought. This would still keep the consistency of leaving bmap_fiemap() with the decision of passing or not. Cheers. > > --D > > > - return 0; > > - return iomap_bmap(mapping, block, &xfs_iomap_ops); > > -} > > - > > STATIC int > > xfs_vm_readpage( > > struct file *unused, > > @@ -1199,7 +1176,6 @@ const struct address_space_operations xfs_address_space_operations = { > > .set_page_dirty = iomap_set_page_dirty, > > .releasepage = xfs_vm_releasepage, > > .invalidatepage = xfs_vm_invalidatepage, > > - .bmap = xfs_vm_bmap, > > .direct_IO = noop_direct_IO, > > .migratepage = iomap_migrate_page, > > .is_partially_uptodate = iomap_is_partially_uptodate, > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h > > index eaae275ed430..c226b562f5da 100644 > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h > > @@ -626,7 +626,6 @@ DEFINE_INODE_EVENT(xfs_readdir); > > #ifdef CONFIG_XFS_POSIX_ACL > > DEFINE_INODE_EVENT(xfs_get_acl); > > #endif > > -DEFINE_INODE_EVENT(xfs_vm_bmap); > > DEFINE_INODE_EVENT(xfs_file_ioctl); > > DEFINE_INODE_EVENT(xfs_file_compat_ioctl); > > DEFINE_INODE_EVENT(xfs_ioctl_setattr); > > -- > > 2.20.1 > > -- Carlos