Re: 266a9a8b41: WARNING:possible_recursive_locking_detected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 08:44:05PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 8:04 PM Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps lockref_get_nested(struct lockref *lockref, unsigned int subclass)?
> > With s/spin_lock/spin_lock_nested/ in the body...
> 
> Sure. Under the usual CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC, with the non-debug case
> just turning into a regular lockref_get().
> 
> Sounds fine to me.

Done and force-pushed into vfs.git#fixes



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux