Re: [patch 09/14] security: dont pass nameidata to security_inode_permission()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 21 May 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote:

> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Only pass nameidata->flags instead of the nameidata to
> security_inode_permission(), synchronizing it with i_op->permission().
> 
> Currently no security module uses the nameidata parameter.
> 
> The other change in ->permission() is that a dentry is passed instead
> of an inode.  Leave this till AppArmor integration, since that will
> need a struct path instead of an inode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
> CC: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>



-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux