Re: [PATCH] fs/userfaultfd.c: simplify the calculation of new_flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ping~

On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 01:38:59PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>Finally new_flags equals old vm_flags *OR* vm_flags.
>
>It is not necessary to mask them first.
>
>Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>---
> fs/userfaultfd.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
>index ccbdbd62f0d8..653d8f7c453c 100644
>--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
>+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
>@@ -1457,7 +1457,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_register(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
> 			start = vma->vm_start;
> 		vma_end = min(end, vma->vm_end);
> 
>-		new_flags = (vma->vm_flags & ~vm_flags) | vm_flags;
>+		new_flags = vma->vm_flags | vm_flags;
> 		prev = vma_merge(mm, prev, start, vma_end, new_flags,
> 				 vma->anon_vma, vma->vm_file, vma->vm_pgoff,
> 				 vma_policy(vma),
>-- 
>2.17.1

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux