Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There doesn't seem to be a strong reason to have another copy of the > filesystem name string in the fs_parameter_description structure; > it's easy enough to get the name from the fs_type, and using it > instead ensures consistency across messages (for example, > vfs_parse_fs_param() already uses fc->fs_type->name for the error > messages, because it doesn't have the fs_parameter_description). > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> It was put there for fs_validate_description() to use. That checks both filesystem and LSM parameter descriptions. We could pass a name in to that function instead. David
