Re: [PATCH v2] xfsprogs: io/copy_range: cover corner case (fd_in == fd_out)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/3/19 6:19 AM, Jianhong.Yin wrote:
> Related bug:
>   copy_file_range return "Invalid argument" when copy in the same file
>   https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202935

that's a CIFS bug though, not related to how xfs_io operates, correct?

What is the failing xfs_io case?  Because this seems to work fine here:

# fallocate -l 128m testfile
# strace -eopen,copy_file_range xfs_io -c "copy_range -s 1m -d 8m -l 2m testfile" testfile
...
open("testfile", O_RDWR)                = 3
...
open("testfile", O_RDONLY)              = 4
copy_file_range(4, [1048576], 3, [8388608], 2097152, 0) = 2097152
+++ exited with 0 +++

this works too:

# strace -eopen,copy_file_range xfs_io -c "copy_range testfile" testfile
...
open("testfile", O_RDWR)                = 3
...
open("testfile", O_RDONLY)              = 4
copy_file_range(4, [0], 3, [0], 134217728, 0) = 0
+++ exited with 0 +++

so can you help me understand what bug you're fixing?

-Eric

> if argument of option -f is "-", use current file->fd as fd_in
> 
> Usage:
>   xfs_io -c 'copy_range -f -' some_file
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jianhong Yin <yin-jianhong@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  io/copy_file_range.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/io/copy_file_range.c b/io/copy_file_range.c
> index b7b9fd88..2dde8a31 100644
> --- a/io/copy_file_range.c
> +++ b/io/copy_file_range.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ copy_range_help(void)
>                            at position 0\n\
>   'copy_range -f 2' - copies all bytes from open file 2 into the current open file\n\
>                            at position 0\n\
> + 'copy_range -f -' - copies all bytes from current open file append the current open file\n\
>  "));
>  }
>  
> @@ -114,11 +115,15 @@ copy_range_f(int argc, char **argv)
>  			}
>  			break;
>  		case 'f':
> -			src_file_nr = atoi(argv[1]);
> -			if (src_file_nr < 0 || src_file_nr >= filecount) {
> -				printf(_("file value %d is out of range (0-%d)\n"),
> -					src_file_nr, filecount - 1);
> -				return 0;
> +			if (strcmp(argv[1], "-") == 0)
> +				src_file_nr = (file - &filetable[0]) / sizeof(fileio_t);
> +			else {
> +				src_file_nr = atoi(argv[1]);
> +				if (src_file_nr < 0 || src_file_nr >= filecount) {
> +					printf(_("file value %d is out of range (0-%d)\n"),
> +						src_file_nr, filecount - 1);
> +					return 0;
> +				}
>  			}
>  			/* Expect no src_path arg */
>  			src_path_arg = 0;
> @@ -147,10 +152,14 @@ copy_range_f(int argc, char **argv)
>  		}
>  		len = sz;
>  
> -		ret = copy_dst_truncate();
> -		if (ret < 0) {
> -			ret = 1;
> -			goto out;
> +		if (fd != file->fd) {
> +			ret = copy_dst_truncate();
> +			if (ret < 0) {
> +				ret = 1;
> +				goto out;
> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			dst = sz;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux