On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 08:39:37PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> >
> > > + if (erofs_inode_version(advise) == EROFS_INODE_LAYOUT_V2) {
> >
> > I still need to wade through the old thread - but didn't you say this
> > wasn't really a new vs old version but a compat vs full inode? Maybe
> > the names aren't that suitable either?
>
> Could you kindly give some suggestions for better naming about it?
> there are all supported by EROFS... (Actually we only mainly use v1...)
Maybe EROFS_INODE_LAYOUT_COMPACT and EROFS_INODE_LAYOUT_EXTENDED?
