From: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@xxxxxxxxxx> As Christoph said, "This looks like a really obsfucated way to write: return datamode == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION || datamode == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION_LEGACY; " Although I had my own consideration, it's the right way for now. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20190829095954.GB20598@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h index 59dcc2e8cb02..87d7ae82339a 100644 --- a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h +++ b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h @@ -62,9 +62,8 @@ enum { static inline bool erofs_inode_is_data_compressed(unsigned int datamode) { - if (datamode == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION) - return true; - return datamode == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION_LEGACY; + return datamode == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION || + datamode == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION_LEGACY; } /* bit definitions of inode i_advise */ -- 2.17.1
