Re: [PATCH 2/9] cachefiles: drop direct usage of ->bmap method.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:

> Not related to this patch, but using iov_iter with dio is trivial, what
> is the blocker therere?

The usual: time.

The change as a whole is not actually trivial since it will involve completely
overhauling the fscache data API and how the filesystems use it - and then
having cachefiles perform the DIO asynchronously as per Trond's requirements
for using fscache with NFS.

I also need to work out how I'm going to do data/hole detection.  Can I set,
say, O_NOREADHOLE and then expect the DIO to stop early with a short read?  Or
do I need to use SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE in advance to define the occupied
regions?

Maybe a better way would be to take a leaf out of the book of OpenAFS and
suchlike and keep a parallel file that tracks the occupancy of a cache object
(eg. a bitmap with 1 bit per 64k block) - but that the synchronisation and
performance issues.

David



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux