* Andrew Morton (akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > For me this change isn't problematic. Yes, it did broken my software and > > yes, I could fix my software but since its working only on specific > > kernels (precompiled by me) I've chosen to revert kernel change instead > > to get old behaviour. > > Ah, it only affects 2.6.25.x and no earlier -stable kernels. Not so bad. > > Greg, Chris? Thoughts? I don't know why it was suppressed to begin with. Seems /proc/partitions parsers already need to deal w/ arbitrary number and type of block devices, so is it really a regression (it was also just removed from nbd)? thanks, -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
