ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) writes: > Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx> writes: > >> 64bit !COMPAT does not build because the llseek syscall is in the >> tables. > > Do I read this right you have a 128 bit offset to llseek on ppc64? > > Looking at the signature it does not appear to make sense to build this > function on any 64bit platform. > > Perhaps the proper fix to to take llseek out of your syscall tables? Sorry I missed seeing the 2 newer version of the patchset in my inbox it seems you have already made the change I am suggesting. Never mind. Eric
