Re: [PATCH v8 06/20] fs: Fill in max and min timestamps in superblock
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: [PATCH v8 06/20] fs: Fill in max and min timestamps in superblock
From
: Tigran Aivazian <aivazian.tigran@xxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:28:32 +0100
Cc
: LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, reiserfs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <CAK+_RLmK0Vy79giAZnUCmmivvRT+GLZXyiMqBoFB0_Ed1W8BkA@mail.gmail.com>
I see no problems for BFS. Acked-By: Tigran Aivazian <aivazian.tigran@xxxxxxxxx>
References
:
[PATCH v8 00/20] vfs: Add support for timestamp limits
From:
Deepa Dinamani
[PATCH v8 06/20] fs: Fill in max and min timestamps in superblock
From:
Deepa Dinamani
Prev by Date:
Re: [PATCH 2/9] cachefiles: drop direct usage of ->bmap method.
Next by Date:
Re: [PATCH 2/9] cachefiles: drop direct usage of ->bmap method.
Previous by thread:
Re: [PATCH v8 06/20] fs: Fill in max and min timestamps in superblock
Next by thread:
[PATCH v8 09/20] ext4: Initialize timestamps limits
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Ext4 Filesystem]
[Union Filesystem]
[Filesystem Testing]
[Ceph Users]
[Ecryptfs]
[AutoFS]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux Cachefs]
[Reiser Filesystem]
[Linux RAID]
[Samba]
[Device Mapper]
[CEPH Development]
