----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > Von: "tytso" <tytso@xxxxxxx> > An: "richard" <richard@xxxxxx> > CC: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gao Xiang" <hsiangkao@xxxxxxx>, "Jan Kara" <jack@xxxxxxx>, "Chao > Yu" <yuchao0@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Dave Chinner" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David Sterba" <dsterba@xxxxxxx>, "Miao Xie" > <miaoxie@xxxxxxxxxx>, "devel" <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Darrick" > <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Amir Goldstein" <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>, > "linux-erofs" <linux-erofs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Al Viro" <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jaegeuk Kim" <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>, > "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Li Guifu" <bluce.liguifu@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Fang Wei" <fangwei1@xxxxxxxxxx>, > "Pavel Machek" <pavel@xxxxxxx>, "linux-fsdevel" <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Andrew Morton" > <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "torvalds" <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 18. August 2019 19:46:21 > Betreff: Re: [PATCH] erofs: move erofs out of staging > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 07:06:40PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> > So holding a file system like EROFS to a higher standard than say, >> > ext4, xfs, or btrfs hardly seems fair. >> >> Nobody claimed that. > > Pointing out that erofs has issues in this area when Gao Xiang is > asking if erofs can be moved out of staging and join the "official > clubhouse" of file systems could certainly be reasonable interpreted > as such. Reporting such vulnerablities are a good thing, and > hopefully all file system maintainers will welcome them. Doing them > on a e-mail thread about promoting out of erofs is certainly going to > lead to inferences of a double standard. Well, this was not at all my intention. erofs raised my attention and instead of wasting a new thread I answered here and reported what I found while looking at it. That's all. Thanks, //richard
