----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- >> How does erofs compare to squashfs? >> IIUC it is designed to be faster. Do you have numbers? >> Feel free to point me older mails if you already showed numbers, >> I have to admit I didn't follow the development very closely. > > You can see the following related material which has microbenchmark > tested on my laptop: > https://static.sched.com/hosted_files/kccncosschn19eng/19/EROFS%20file%20system_OSS2019_Final.pdf > > which was mentioned in the related topic as well: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190815044155.88483-1-gaoxiang25@xxxxxxxxxx/ Thanks! Will read into. While digging a little into the code I noticed that you have very few checks of the on-disk data. For example ->u.i_blkaddr. I gave it a try and created a malformed filesystem where u.i_blkaddr is 0xdeadbeef, it causes the kernel to loop forever around erofs_read_raw_page(). Thanks, //richard
