Hi hch, On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 12:43:48AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 09:40:05AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > Since I do not see the lack of reviewing capacity problem get solved > > > anytime soon, I was wondering if you are ok with putting the code > > > in drivers/staging/vboxsf for now, until someone can review it and ack it > > > for moving over to sf/vboxsf ? > > > > I have no objection to that if the vfs developers do not mind. > > We had really bad experiences with fs code in staging. I think it is > a bad idea that should not be repeated. I had no intention to join this topic. However, out of curiousty, I'd like to hear your opinion about EROFS. I personally think that's not so bad? EROFS is designed for the specific goal, and it is proven that it has much better performance than other compress filesystems even uncompressed filesystems with proper hardware combinations. And we have an active team (with paid job) and some other companies (primary in Android scope) have contacted with me in private about using this as well. We are doing our best efforts on moving out of staging, and I personally think the code seems not bad... Can you give me some more hints in advance? Thank you very much, Gao Xiang
