Re: [PATCH 4/9] fibmap: Use bmap instead of ->bmap method in ioctl_fibmap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > 
> > > Maybe I am not seeing something or having a different thinking you have, but
> > > this is the behavior we have now, without my patches. And we can't really change
> > > it; the user view of this implementation.
> > > That's why I didn't try to change the result, so the truncation still happens.
> > 
> > I understand that we're not generally supposed to change existing
> > userspace interfaces, but the fact remains that allowing truncated
> > responses causes *filesystem corruption*.
> > 
> > We know that the most well known FIBMAP callers are bootloaders, and we
> > know what they do with the information they get -- they use it to record
> > the block map of boot files.  So if the IPL/grub/whatever installer
> > queries the boot file and the boot file is at block 12345678901 (a
> > 34-bit number), this interface truncates that to 3755744309 (a 32-bit
> > number) and that's where the bootloader will think its boot files are.
> > The installation succeeds, the user reboots and *kaboom* the system no
> > longer boots because the contents of block 3755744309 is not a bootloader.
> > 
> > Worse yet, grub1 used FIBMAP data to record the location of the grub
> > environment file and installed itself between the MBR and the start of
> > partition 1.  If the environment file is at offset 1234578901, grub will
> > write status data to its environment file (which it thinks is at
> > 3755744309) and *KABOOM* we've just destroyed whatever was in that
> > block.
> > 
> > Far better for the bootloader installation script to hit an error and
> > force the admin to deal with the situation than for the system to become
> > unbootable.  That's *why* the (newer) iomap bmap implementation does not
> > return truncated mappings, even though the classic implementation does.
> > 
> > The classic code returning truncated results is a broken behavior.
> 
> How long as it been broken for? And if we do fix it, I'd just like for
> a nice commit lot describing potential risks of not applying it. *If*
> the issue exists as-is today, the above contains a lot of information
> for addressing potential issues, even if theoretical.
> 

It's broken since forever. This has always been the FIBMAP behavior.


>   Luis

-- 
Carlos



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux