Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions, failover, performance.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:28:37PM +0100, Jamie Lokier (jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> I think that's a fine choice, but it doesn't solve difficult
> problems.  You still have to implement the server cloud. :-)

If that would not be dificult problem, it would not be interesting at
all :)

> It's possible that implementing server cloud protocol _and_ simple
> client protocol may be more work than just server cloud protocol.  I'm
> not sure.  Thoughts welcome.

Well, getting that client protocol is mostly ready, and its design
allows infinite (blah!) extensions and extremely (blah!) flexible
processing, we are close to just difficult server one :)

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux