Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
That can be the case if client connects to some gate server, which in
turn broadcasts data further, that is how I plan to implement things at
first.
That means you are less optimal than the direct-to-storage-server path
in NFSv4.1, then........
<waves red flag in front of the bull>
If access controls permit, the ideal would be for the client to avoid an
intermediary when storing data. The client only _needs_ a consensus
reply that their transaction was committed. They don't necessarily need
an intermediary to do the boring data transfer work.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
