On Wed, 2019-07-10 at 10:18 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-07-10 at 09:49 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 7/10/19 9:38 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> > > On 7/10/2019 6:34 AM, Aaron Goidel wrote:
> > > > @@ -3261,6 +3262,26 @@ static int selinux_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name)
> > > > return -EACCES;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static int selinux_inode_notify(struct inode *inode, u64 mask)
> > > > +{
> > > > + u32 perm = FILE__WATCH; // basic permission, can a watch be set?
> > >
> > > We don't use // comments in the Linux kernel.
> > >
> >
> > I thought that we had recently moved into the 21st century on that issue,
> > but I don't see it mentioned in coding-style.rst. Maybe we need a Doc update.
> >
> > checkpatch allows C99 comments by default.
> > Joe, do you recall about this?
>
> My recollection is it was something I thought was
> just simple and useful so I added it to checkpatch
> without going through the negative of the nominal
> approvals required by modifying CodingStyle.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/8/625
