On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:05:28PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > > A separate question--does the problem you reported with interrupted lock > > > > requests still exist? > > > > > > No, that bug seems to have gone away in 2.6.26-rc1. Don't know how, > > > since the 2.6.25 + nfs.git was still bad. > > > > Yipes. > > > > > Should I bisect it to see which patch solved it? ;) > > > > That would be kinda amusing.... > > > > Well, and since I don't remember seeing anything that'd fix that I'd > > like to make sure it isn't still lurking. > > Well, it was in the nfs-2.6 tree after all (commit 4d7c402). I just I think you must mean c4d7c402b788b73dc24f1e54a57f89d3dc5eb7bc, "NFS: Remove the buggy lock-if-signalled case from do_setlk()"? > mucked up testing the last time, probably because I didn't truly > believe in this fix. OK, that makes much more sense! Thanks for the confirmation. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
