Re: [PATCH v5 13/18] kunit: tool: add Python wrappers for running KUnit tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 01:02:55AM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 5:01 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 01:26:08AM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-all_passed.log
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-crash.log
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-failure.log
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run.log
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_output_isolated_correctly.log
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_read_from_file.kconfig
> >
> > Why are these being added upstream? The commit log does not explain
> > this.
> 
> Oh sorry, those are for testing purposes. I thought that was clear
> from being in the test_data directory. I will reference it in the
> commit log in the next revision.

Still, I don't get it. They seem to be results from a prior run. Why do
we need them for testing purposes?

  Luis



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux