On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 07:52:44AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The fail argument is long gone, update the comment. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Looks ok, Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> --D > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c > index 9cceb90e77c5..dc60aec0c5a7 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c > @@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ xfs_map_blocks( > * reference to the ioend to ensure that the ioend completion is only done once > * all bios have been submitted and the ioend is really done. > * > - * If @fail is non-zero, it means that we have a situation where some part of > + * If @status is non-zero, it means that we have a situation where some part of > * the submission process has failed after we have marked paged for writeback > * and unlocked them. In this situation, we need to fail the bio and ioend > * rather than submit it to IO. This typically only happens on a filesystem > -- > 2.20.1 >