On 2019/6/18 4:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 02:16:11AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: >> At last, this is RFC patch v1, which means it is not suitable for >> merging soon... I'm still working on it, testing its stability >> these days and hope these patches get merged for 5.3 LTS >> (if 5.3 is a LTS version). > > Why would 5.3 be a LTS kernel? > > curious as to how you came up with that :) My personal thought is about one LTS kernel one year... Usually 5 versions after the previous kernel...(4.4 -> 4.9 -> 4.14 -> 4.19), which is not suitable for all historical LTSs...just prepare for 5.3... Thanks, Gao Xiang > > thanks, > > greg k-h >
