Re: Help with reviewing dosfstools patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx>, util-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Help with reviewing dosfstools patches
From: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:45:20 +0200
In-reply-to: <ae5097ee-12af-2807-d48c-4274b4fc856d@metux.net>
Organization: metux IT consult
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1

On 14.06.19 16:20, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:

<snip>

Currently working through your branches. Smells like they really deserve
a rebase and signed-off lines.


--mtx

-- 
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@xxxxxxxxx -- +49-151-27565287

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Help with reviewing dosfstools patches
  - From: Pali Rohár
- Re: Help with reviewing dosfstools patches
  - From: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult

References:
- Help with reviewing dosfstools patches
  - From: Pali Rohár
- Re: Help with reviewing dosfstools patches
  - From: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH net] mpls: fix af_mpls dependencies
Next by Date: Re: pagecache locking (was: bcachefs status update) merged)
Previous by thread: Re: Help with reviewing dosfstools patches
Next by thread: Re: Help with reviewing dosfstools patches
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux