On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 08:08:09AM -0700, Ray Lee wrote: > > One could hardcode the output of the last three (four?) fields, yes? > > Slightly grotty, but if it comes with a decent memory savings... > > How can it be a 'decent memory saving'? There is exactly _one_ struct > dentry_stat_t in the entire kernel. So you're talking about saving 4 > ints, or 16 bytes. Bet you it'd be more bytes to hardcode printing zero. <shrug> Well, if there's one, then obviously there isn't. I'd assumed it was a per-dentry overhead. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
