RE: [RFC PATCH 1/5] signal: Teach sigsuspend to use set_user_sigmask

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Oleg Nesterov
> Sent: 12 June 2019 14:35
> On 06/12, David Laight wrote:
> >
> > > > If I add a signal handler for SIGINT it is called when pselect()
> > > > returns regardless of the return value.
> > >
> > > That is odd.  Is this with Oleg's fix applied?
> >
> > No it is a 5.1.0-rc5 kernel with no related local patches.
> > So it is the 'historic' behaviour of pselect().
> 
> No, this is not historic behaviour,
> 
> > But not the original one! Under 2.6.22-5-31 the signal handler isn't caller
> > when pselect() returns 1.
> 
> This is historic behaviour.
> 
> And it was broken by 854a6ed56839a4 ("signal: Add restore_user_sigmask()").
> 
> And this is what we already discussed many, many times in this thread ;)

My brain hurts :-)

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux