On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:28 PM Kirill Smelkov <kirr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Miklos, would 4K -> `sizeof(fuse_in_header) + sizeof(fuse_write_in)` for > header room change be accepted? Yes, next cycle. For 4.2 I'll just push the revert. Thanks, Miklos
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:28 PM Kirill Smelkov <kirr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Miklos, would 4K -> `sizeof(fuse_in_header) + sizeof(fuse_write_in)` for > header room change be accepted? Yes, next cycle. For 4.2 I'll just push the revert. Thanks, Miklos