On Tue, 6 May 2008 05:24:26 +0100 Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:12:51PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 05 May 2008 12:16:22 +0200 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > R/O bind mounts require operations which modify the filesystem to be > > > wrapped in mnt_want_write()/mnt_drop_write(). Create helpers which do > > > this, so callers won't need to bother, and more importantly, cannot > > > forget! Call these path_*, analogous to vfs_*. Since there are no > > > callers of vfs_* left, make them static. > > > > ooh, yum. This appears to address my main complaint about the r-o-bind-mount > > stuff: fragility. > > > > > Overall this patchset is just 23 lines in the red, but at the same > > > time it fixes several places in nfsd and the whole of ecryptfs, where > > > the mnt_want_write/drop_write() calls were missing. > > > > Yeah, like that. > > Except that it fixes nothing in nfsd, as we'd already figured out and > "solution" for ecryptfs is more than slightly dubious. Not that nfsd > one wasn't... Well OK. But those open-coded mnt_want_write() calls all over the place still stink. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html