On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 06:21:45PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> What do you think of:
>
> "AT_ATOMIC_DATA (since Linux 5.x)
> A filesystem which accepts this flag will guarantee that if the linked file
> name exists after a system crash, then all of the data written to the file
> and all of the file's metadata at the time of the linkat(2) call will be
> visible.
".... will be visible after the the file system is remounted". (Never
hurts to be explicit.)
> The way to achieve this guarantee on old kernels is to call fsync (2)
> before linking the file, but doing so will also results in flushing of
> volatile disk caches.
>
> A filesystem which accepts this flag does NOT
> guarantee that any of the file hardlinks will exist after a system crash,
> nor that the last observed value of st_nlink (see stat (2)) will persist."
>
This is I think more precise:
This guarantee can be achieved by calling fsync(2) before linking
the file, but there may be more performant ways to provide these
semantics. In particular, note that the use of the AT_ATOMIC_DATA
flag does *not* guarantee that the new link created by linkat(2)
will be persisted after a crash.
We should also document that a file system which does not implement
this flag MUST return EINVAL if it is passed this flag to linkat(2).
- Ted
