Re: pselect/etc semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) writes:

> Which means I believe we have a semantically valid change in behavior
> that is causing a regression.

I haven't made a survey of all of the functions yet but
fucntions return -ENORESTARTNOHAND will never return -EINTR and are
immune from this problem.

AKA pselect is fine.  While epoll_pwait can be affected.

Has anyone contacted Omar Kilani to see if that is his issue?
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+8F9hicnF=kvjXPZFQy=Pa2HJUS3JS+G9VswFHNQQynPMHGVQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

So far the only regression report I am seeing is from Eric Wong.
AKA https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190501021405.hfvd7ps623liu25i@dcvr/
Are there any others?  How did we get to be talking about more
than just epoll_pwait?

Eric



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux