Deepa, it seems that we both are saying the same things again and again, and we simply can't understand each other. I'll try to write another email to restart this discussion. Tomorrow, somehow I can't wake up today. And let me repeat, of course I can be wrong. IOW, it is not that I am trying to blame you for all this confusion. On 05/24, Deepa Dinamani wrote: > > > > Ok, then can you point out what specifically was wrong with > > > 854a6ed56839a? > > > > Cough. If nothing else the lost -EINTR? > > This was my theory. My basis behind the theory was [1](the issue with > return value not being updated) above. And, you are saying this is ok. I agree that "the lost -EINTR" above was not clear. I'll try to clarify what I think is not OK. Oleg.
