Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] fscrypt: key management improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] fscrypt: key management improvements
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 23:29:34 -0400
Cc: linux-fscrypt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Satya Tangirala <satyat@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, keyrings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Paul Crowley <paulcrowley@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20190521004119.GA647@sol.localdomain>
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 05:41:20PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> 
> This was answered in the cover letter, quoted below:

Oops, thanks.  My bad, I stopped reading when I saw the changelog, and
missed that part of the description.

					- Ted

References:
- [PATCH v6 00/16] fscrypt: key management improvements
  - From: Eric Biggers
- Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] fscrypt: key management improvements
  - From: Theodore Ts'o
- Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] fscrypt: key management improvements
  - From: Eric Biggers

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 16/16] dcache: Add CONFIG_DCACHE_SMO
Next by Date: [PATCH v3] kernel: fix typos and some coding style in comments
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] fscrypt: key management improvements
Next by thread: [PATCH v2] libnvdimm/pmem: Bypass CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY overhead
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux