On Friday 02 May 2008, Jeff Schroeder wrote: [ Btrfs oops with apparmor patched in ] > Make is not my forte, but here is a working test to see if apparmor > exists in Ubuntu 8.04. > Maybe have make apply a patch to the btrfs source if this test > succeeds? Does this work in SUSE? > > http://www.digitalprognosis.com/opensource/patches/btrfs/lame_apparmor_test >_for_btrfs.patch > Thanks, but this uses CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR which isn't enough to tell if the kernel has the patch. Lets go back to Jeff's suse patch: /* * Even if AppArmor isn't enabled, it still has different prototypes. * Add more distro/version pairs here to declare which has AppArmor applied. */ #if defined(CONFIG_SUSE_KERNEL) # if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,22) # define REMOVE_SUID_PATH 1 # endif #endif Could someone from Ubuntu please suggest a replacement for CONFIG_SUSE_KERNEL and KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,22) that would correspond with ubuntu kernels shipped with apparmor? We don't need some define from the apparmor patch, just a global flag that says it comes from ubuntu is enough. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
