On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 06:46:55PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 14:34 -0700, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > My only concern is the proliferation of 'simple_*' operations: in some > > cases in libfs.c we explicitly label those as being for in-memory/ramfs > > filesystems, whereas in other cases (such as this one) the name appears > > to be used for more generic functions. > > I'm all to happy to give it a different name. Any suggestions? would the vfs_* prefix make sense here? -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
