Re: [PATCH] signal: Adjust error codes according to restore_user_sigmask()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sorry, I was trying a new setup at work. I should have tested it.
> My bad, I've checked this one.

Thanks.  This is good w.r.t. epoll_pwait and ppoll when applied
to 5.0.11 (no fs/io_uring.c).

Can't think of anything which uses pselect or aio on my system;
but it looks right to me.

> I've removed the questionable reported-by, since we're not sure if
> it is actually the same issue.

Yes, I hope Omar can test this, too.

Thanks again, all!



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux