Re: Initial patches for Incremental FS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 09:10:34AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:

> +Why isn't incremental-fs implemented via FUSE?
> +----------------------------------------------
> +TLDR: FUSE-based filesystems add 20-80% of performance overhead for target
> +scenarios, and increase power use on mobile beyond acceptable limit
> +for widespread deployment. A custom kernel filesystem is the way to overcome
> +these limitations.
> +
> 
> There are several paragraphs of more detail which I leave for the
> interested reader to review....

Why not CODA, though, with local fs as cache?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux