Re: [PATCH]Introduce generalized hooks for getting and setting inode secctx.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



My main goal here is to get labeled-nfs in to mainline in chunks instead
of throwing massive 25+ patch sets at you later on. People are far less
likely to review patch sets when they are massive so I figured a series
of smaller chunks would attract more attention. I have no problem
working off of a labeled-nfs tree with this patches applied to it but
I'd like to avoid getting stuff reacked every time I post it.

Dave

On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 01:04 +1000, James Morris wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:33:22AM +1000, James Morris wrote:
> > > Cristoph, Casey -- any chance of getting ack or nack on this before the 
> > > merge window closes?
> > 
> > No concernes about this patch, but as usual strong objections against
> > introducing it without the actual user.
> 
> Ok, we might put them into a labeled-nfs tree rather than pushing them to 
> mainline at this stage.
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux