Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] [io_uring] require RWF_HIPRI for iopoll reads and writes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/1/19 5:52 AM, Stefan Bühler wrote:
> This makes the mapping RWF_HIPRI <-> IOCB_HIPRI <-> iopoll more
> consistent; it also allows supporting iopoll operations without
> IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL in the future.

I don't want to make this change now. Additionally, it's never
going to be possible to support polled IO mixed with non-polled
IO on an io_uring instance, as that makes the wait part of IO
impossible to support without adding tracking of requests.

As we can never mix them, it doesn't make a lot of sense to
request RWF_HIPRI for polled IO.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux